Subject to change.
Subject to change.
Dr. Anil Parwani is a Professor of Pathology and Biomedical Informatics at The Ohio State University. He serves as the Donald A. Senhauser Chair of the Department of Pathology and the Chief of Pathology Services for the Health System.. Dr Parwani has authored over four hundred peer-reviewed articles in major scientific journals and several books and book chapters. Dr. Parwani is the Editor-in-chief of Diagnostic Pathology and Co-editor of the Journal of Pathology Informatics.
Clinicians usually refer to a diverse array of published articles, textbooks, personal notes, and online resources for diagnostic decision-making, particularly in complex cases. However, the vast volume of available data often exceeds human memory capacity, leading to inadvertent loss of critical information over time. While recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) based systems enable a first pass search but fail to capture the depth and interconnected nature of medical knowledge required for accurate diagnostics. Dermatopathology is the perfect example as dermatopathologists often refer to not only pathology references but also to a lot of dermatology resources. In our study we use the integration of LLMs and Knowledge Graphs (KGs) for dermatopathology resources to highlight the enhancement of diagnostic capabilities through the structured understanding and dynamic processing of the vast resources of data as compared to a RAG based system.
.
This presentation highlights an advanced AI framework that combines the precision of KGs with the contextual comprehension of LLMs to create superior query tools for dermatopathology knowledge. We opted for KGs over traditional RAG systems due to their advanced ability to structure and interconnect vast arrays of data. This structuring not only links directly queried information but also intelligently surfaces related concepts and context not explicitly mentioned in the search terms, significantly enhancing the depth and relevance of insights for improved diagnostic accuracy. We compare query tools using the RAG model with LLM with those using KGs with LLMs. Our approach harnesses four key advantages of KG-based systems:
We used the author’s personal knowledge repository and automatically created a knowledge graph using LLMs as an intermediate tool. Further with LLMs as the interaction layer made extracting information from the KGs simple and distributable. We used the same knowledge repository to create a RAG based system as a baseline comparison.
For testing we worked with a cohort of 10 dermatopathologists of which 5 worked with a standard RAG+LLM system and 5 with the KG + LLM system, testing for complex questions that required multi-hop associations as in real life drawn from an identical question bank. In the preliminary cohort of 100 questions, the KG+LLM system gave 100% accuracy compared to the RAG+LLM system, which completely failed on multi-hop associations. We will expand the testing with a larger cohort of users as well as an expanded question bank. Future work will focus on continuously expanding the KG to include new research and adapting the LLM integration to incorporate these updates seamlessly.
The implications of our research extend beyond improved diagnostic accuracy, suggesting significant enhancements in clinical workflows, patient outcomes, and the economic aspects of healthcare delivery. This system also facilitates the creation of personalized knowledge graphs for individual practitioners, enhancing their diagnostic capabilities and operational efficiency.
Learning Objectives